Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Volkswagen Caravelle

What is Better BMW X1 or Volkswagen Caravelle?

Comparing BMW X1 with Volkswagen Caravelle can help you make it clear which model is more efficient. We came up with 11 ideas to go for BMW X1 - it's beating Volkswagen Caravelle, according to these cases. Nevertheless, Volkswagen Caravelle shows 12 strong pluses that make it great buy instead of BMW X1. We can name major specs of BMW X1 and Volkswagen Caravelle that were taken into account while comparing. It will help you decide on the more efficient option - compare two cars before making decision. Anyway Caravelle is uneasy to see as a worse car, as Volkswagen gave out a lot of efforts in the production.

Exterior

BMW X1 Volkswagen Caravelle

11 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 79.5 mm 5% or 4.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

143 bhp vs 104 bhp

105 kw. vs 76 kw.

27% or 39 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 250 nM 22% or 70 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 18.4 sec. 8.8 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 99 mph 25 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 129 g/mile 52% or 44 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1470 kg vs 2199 kg 50% or 729 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.3 meters vs 11.9 meters 5% or 0.6 meters

12 reasons to buy Volkswagen Caravelle

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.5 vs 16.5 11% or 2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 90 mm 6% or 5.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 36.7 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 48% or 17.55 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.22 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 42% or 17.83 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 29.69 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 56% or 16.58 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 61 liters 24% or 19 liters
More maximum allowable weight 3000 kg vs 2030 kg 32% or 970 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 801 kg vs 560 kg 30% or 241 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2200 kg vs 1800 kg 18% or 400 kg
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 75 kg 25% or 25 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 5 2

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Volkswagen Caravelle

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 3500 RPM 13% or 500 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1896 cm3 5% or 99 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4454 mm vs 4890 mm 9% or 436 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1904 mm 6% or 106 mm narrower
Height 1545 mm vs 1949 mm 21% or 404 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 3000 mm 8% or 240 mm less
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/65 R16
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/65 R16
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs 215/65 R16 steel
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes vs MIYATO
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)