Last Update: Apr. 07, 2020, 5:34 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Volkswagen Eos

What is Better BMW X1 or Volkswagen Eos?

Choosing for Volkswagen Eos vs BMW X1 might be uneasy, so we want to compare them. We came up with 13 ideas to go for BMW X1 - it's above Volkswagen Eos, according to these points. Nevertheless, Volkswagen Eos shows 8 strong pluses that make it wonderful buy instead of BMW X1. We found important features of BMW X1 and Volkswagen Eos that were taken into account while comparing. Choose speed or horse powers, measure wheel base, and easily compare two cars. BMW did a lot to present X1 as the most worthwhile car in its class. Nevertheless Volkswagen doesn't lag behind and includes its best developments in Eos. The detailed review can't leave any questions about deciding on a car.

Exterior

BMW X1 Volkswagen Eos

13 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 81 mm 4% or 3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

143 bhp vs 140 bhp

105 kw. vs 103 kw.

2% or 3 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 10.4 sec. 0.8 sec.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 98 g/mile 15% or 13 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 420 liters vs 380 liters 10% or 40 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 55 liters 10% or 6 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2030 kg vs 2010 kg 1% or 20 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 560 kg vs 462 kg 18% or 98 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1800 kg vs 1500 kg 17% or 300 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1470 kg vs 1548 kg 5% or 78 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

8 reasons to buy Volkswagen Eos

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.5 vs 16.5 11% or 2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 90 mm 6% or 5.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Performance
More top speed 126 mph vs 124 mph 2 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 47.11 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 15% or 7.14 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 56.46 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 6% or 3.59 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 35.28 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 31% or 10.99 mpg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.9 meters vs 11.3 meters 4% or 0.4 meters

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Volkswagen Eos

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1968 cm3 1% or 27 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4454 mm vs 4407 mm 1% or 47 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1791 mm 0% or 7 mm wider
Height 1545 mm vs 1437 mm 7% or 108 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2578 mm 7% or 182 mm more
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/55 R16
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/55 R16
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs Compact
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes vs ADELAIDE
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)