Last Update: Jun. 18, 2019, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Elise and Toyota Picnic

What is Better Lotus Elise or Toyota Picnic?

Exterior

Lotus Elise Toyota Picnic

9 reasons to buy Lotus Elise

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.5 vs 9.5 10% or 1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 89.3 mm vs 86 mm 4% or 3.3 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.7 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 6 sec.
More top speed 126 mph vs 109 mph 17 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 110 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 29% or 32 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 3 vs EURO 2 1 generation
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 785 kg vs 1440 kg 83% or 655 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

11 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 80 mm 7% or 6 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

126 bhp vs 120 bhp

94 kw. vs 90 kw.

5% or 6 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 178 nM vs 168 nM 6% or 10 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 38.5 mpg 32% or 9.4 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 46 mpg 27% or 9.8 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 29.99 mpg 38% or 8.3 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 182 liters vs 115 liters 37% or 67 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 32 liters 47% or 28 liters
Warranty
More painted surfaces warranty 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
More seats 6 vs 2 4

Neutral reasons Lotus Elise vs. Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5600 RPM vs 5400 RPM 4% or 200 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1796 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 10% or 202 cm3 less
Engine position Mid transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 4 1 more
Dimensions
Length 3785 mm vs 4530 mm 16% or 745 mm shorter
Width 1719 mm vs 1695 mm 1% or 24 mm wider
Height 1143 mm vs 1660 mm 31% or 517 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 175/55 R16V vs 195/65R14
Rear tires size 225/45 R17V vs 195/65R14
Spare wheel INFLATOR vs 195/65R14 steel
Type of wheels 16" FR 17" R alloy wheels vs 14 alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)