Last Update: May. 20, 2019, 5:16 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Lotus Esprit and Peugeot Partner Tepee

What is Better Lotus Esprit or Peugeot Partner Tepee?

Exterior

Lotus Esprit Peugeot Partner Tepee

12 reasons to buy Lotus Esprit

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 75 mm 10% or 8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

350 bhp vs 75 bhp

260 kw. vs 55 kw.

79% or 275 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 400 nM vs 185 nM 54% or 215 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.8 sec. vs 17.1 sec. 12.3 sec.
More top speed 170 mph vs 94 mph 76 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 21.24 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 151% or 32.03 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 30.33 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 98% or 29.72 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 14.12 mpg vs 44.11 mpg 212% or 29.99 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 73 liters vs 60 liters 18% or 13 liters
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1380 kg vs 1601 kg 16% or 221 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

7 reasons to buy Peugeot Partner Tepee

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 88.3 mm vs 81 mm 8% or 7.3 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 204 g/mile 137% or 118 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Less noise level 72.1 dB vs 74 dB 3% or 1.9 dB
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 2 3

Neutral reasons Lotus Esprit vs. Peugeot Partner Tepee

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6500 RPM vs 4000 RPM 38% or 2500 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3506 cm3 vs 1560 cm3 56% or 1946 cm3 more
Engine position Mid-mounted vs Front transverse
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection twin-turbo vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4369 mm vs 4380 mm 0% or 11 mm shorter
Width 1883 mm vs 1810 mm 4% or 73 mm wider
Height 1150 mm vs 1803 mm 36% or 653 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 235/40 ZR17 vs 205/65 R15
Rear tires size 285/35 ZR18 vs 205/65 R15
Spare wheel Compact (saving space) vs 205/65 R15
Type of wheels Front 8.5J/black 10J vs 15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)