Last Update: Mar. 21, 2019, 5:35 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Maserati 3200 GT and Mazda 626

What is Better Maserati 3200 GT or Mazda 626?

Exterior

Maserati 3200 GT Mazda 626

10 reasons to buy Maserati 3200 GT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

370 bhp vs 115 bhp

271 kw. vs 85 kw.

69% or 255 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 491 nM vs 170 nM 65% or 321 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.1 sec. vs 10.6 sec. 5.5 sec.
More top speed 174 mph vs 119 mph 55 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 18.1 mpg vs 37.22 mpg 106% or 19.12 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 26.4 mpg vs 45.56 mpg 73% or 19.16 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.8 mpg vs 26.61 mpg 126% or 14.81 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 90 liters vs 64 liters 29% or 26 liters
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

9 reasons to buy Mazda 626

Engine and transmission
Better compression 9.7 vs 8.0 18% or 1.7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 80 mm 4% or 3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 80 mm 13% or 12 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 122 g/mile vs 230 g/mile 89% or 108 g/mile
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 6 years vs 2 years 67% or 4 years
More painted surfaces warranty 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1316 kg vs 1590 kg 21% or 274 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

Neutral reasons Maserati 3200 GT vs. Mazda 626

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6250 RPM vs 6000 RPM 4% or 250 more rpms.
Engine capacity 3217 cm3 vs 1991 cm3 38% or 1226 cm3 more
Cylinders location V8 vs In line
Camshaft QUAD CAM vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4510 mm vs 4675 mm 4% or 165 mm shorter
Width 1822 mm vs 1710 mm 6% or 112 mm wider
Height 1305 mm vs 1515 mm 14% or 210 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2660 mm vs 2670 mm 0% or 10 mm less
Front tires size 235/40 ZR18 vs 195/60 R15
Rear tires size 238/35 ZR18 vs 195/60 R15
Spare wheel 235/40 ZR18 vs 195/60 R15
Type of wheels 18 alloy wheels vs 15" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)