Last Update: Aug. 02, 2020, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester

What is Better Mazda CX-5 or Subaru Forester?

Comparing Mazda CX-5 with Subaru Forester will help you make decision which car is better. We revealed 7 factors to purchase Mazda CX-5 - it's winning Subaru Forester, according to such points. Anyway, Subaru Forester provides 4 weighty pluses that make it wonderful buy instead of Mazda CX-5. We can name vital specs of Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester which were used while making comparison. It can help you choose the better vehicle - compare two cars before buying. CX-5 was produced by Mazda to win contestants in the class. The detailed match won't keep any hesitations about deciding on a car.


Mazda CX-5 Subaru Forester

7 reasons to buy Mazda CX-5

Engine and transmission
More engine power

162 bhp vs 147 bhp

vs 108 kw.

9% or 15 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.9 sec. vs 10.4 sec. 1.5 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 116 mph 8 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 47.2 mpg vs 44.78 mpg 5% or 2.42 mpg
Less CO2 emissions 86 g/mile vs 104 g/mile 21% or 18 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 503 liters vs 450 liters 11% or 53 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1350 kg vs 1540 kg 14% or 190 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

4 reasons to buy Subaru Forester

Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 64 liters vs 56 liters 13% or 8 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 690 kg 8% or 60 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1800 kg 10% or 200 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.5 meters vs 11 meters 5% or 0.5 meters

Neutral reasons Mazda CX-5 vs. Subaru Forester

Engine and transmission
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4540 mm vs 4560 mm 0% or 20 mm shorter
Width 1840 mm vs 1780 mm 3% or 60 mm wider
Height 1670 mm vs 1675 mm 0% or 5 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2615 mm 3% or 85 mm more

Comparison of Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester: conclusions and opinions

When buyers take Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester and view all the specs, it's difficult to make a quick conclusion. Spend 2 minutes to read all facts about the comparison. There are 4 vital paragraphs and a final conclusion to learn everything about Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester.

General Review of Mazda CX-5 vs. Subaru Forester

There are actually huge and minor distinctions in these two cars. There was a time when Mazda shipped quite a lot of CX-5 cars. But Subaru with its Forester, also guarantees wonderful opportunities and is a leader in some situations. The dimensions ratio of the cars is an important thing to view. The height of Mazda CX-5 is 1670 mm; it offers a length of 4540 mm and width of 1840 mm; it is 1350 kg. Match it with 1675 mm of height, 1780 mm of width, and 4560 mm of length of Subaru Forester. It weighs nearly 1540 kg. Looking at wheelbase, Mazda CX-5 shows 2700 mm and Subaru Forester has got 2615 mm of base length.

Now it's time to consider motors. Mazda CX-5 offers 4 cylinders engine with 162 bhp capacity. 4 cylinders and 147 bhp of output are found under the hood of Subaru Forester. Thinking about speeding, Mazda CX-5 goes from 0 to 60 miles per hour for 8.9 sec. while Subaru Forester makes it for 10.4 sec.. It's needed to take into account that the max speed of Forester is 116 mph while CX-5 will drive at 124 mph.

Safety of Mazda CX-5 in comparison with Subaru Forester

These cars are considered to be quite safe. For Mazda CX-5, safety options became an important part of producing, and Mazda did the best for the time. That's why CX-5 wins a lot of safety comparisons. Safety of a human is the major plus of Subaru Forester. The vehicle was also a ratings leader and turned Subaru popular.Also, Forester has got wonderful steering and breaking systems for enhanced safety.

Which car is more Eco-friendly: Mazda CX-5 or Subaru Forester

It's really important if your personal vehicle is nature friendly. Emission of CO2 for Mazda CX-5 equals 86 g/mile, but Subaru Forester worsens this figure - 104 g/mile. CX-5 is more ecological than Forester. We need to think of which engine types produce pollution. Consider Mazda: its vehicle proposes 162 bhp of capacity. 147 bhp engine is a less-friendly decision of Subaru.

Fuel consumption and efficiency of Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester

When talking about gas consumption, we have to see numbers. Subaru Forester can only get 44.78 mpg while Mazda CX-5 extends this number to 47.2 mpg. It's easy to understand that 1 gallon will drive you further with Mazda than Subaru. 56 liters of fuel allows drivers to go quite a distance with CX-5 on one fill. Compare it to 64 liters tank's volume in Forester. By using more gas, the Subaru Forester offers all the winning options of a 1998 cm3 engine. The motor of the Forester causes less problems than the motor of the CX-5. Anyway the Mazda CX-5 can save owners' funds because the engine is only 1998 cm3.

Conclusion and opinions

It's not easy to know if Subaru Forester wins in competition with Mazda CX-5. The cars are successful in car shops. Think of CX-5 through 7 evident advantages to get it, but don't forget about the 4 pluses of Forester. If you're a adorer of Mazda, then you'll discover more minuses of Subaru, but try to be impartial when comparing these vehicles.
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)