What is better Mazda CX-5 or Subaru Forester?


Comparing Mazda CX-5 with Subaru Forester will help you make decision which car is better. We revealed 11 factors to purchase Mazda CX-5 - it's winning Subaru Forester, according to such points. Anyway, Subaru Forester provides 3 weighty pluses that make it wonderful buy instead of Mazda CX-5. We can name vital specs of Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester which were used while making comparison. It can help you choose the better vehicle - compare two cars before buying. CX-5 was produced by Mazda to win contestants in the class. The detailed match won't keep any hesitations about deciding on a car.


Mazda CX-5
Subaru Forester
Mazda CX-5
Subaru Forester

11 reasons to buy Mazda CX-5

  1. Better compression
    13% or 1.9 more. The higher the compression ratio, the less fuel is required to achieve the same power. This can affect the engine's efficiency.
    14.4 compression 12.5 compression
  2. Piston stroke longer
    5% or 4.3 mm longer. The longer the piston stroke, the better the engine’s fuel combustion efficiency. This reduces fuel consumption and creates a more environmentally-friendly engine.
    94.3 mm Piston stroke 90 mm Piston stroke
  3. Larger cylinder bore
    2% or 2 mm more. The larger the cylinder bore, the better the combustion chamber fills. This provides power but can also increase engine emissions.
    86 mm cylinder bore 84 mm cylinder bore
  4. More torque
    49% or 186 Nm more. The higher the torque, the faster the acceleration.
    380 Nm @ 1800-2600 Rpm torque 194 Nm @ 4000 rpm. torque
  5. Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
    1.1 sec faster. The faster the acceleration, the faster the driver can reach optimal speed, though this can contribute to greater fuel consumption.
    10.7 sec acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 11.8 sec acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
  6. More top speed
    83 km/h more. The higher the top speed, the faster the car travels on the highway.
    200 km/h / 124mph top speed 117 km/h / 73mph top speed
  7. Faster acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
    10% or 1.1 sec faster. The faster the acceleration, the faster the driver can reach optimal speed, though this can contribute to greater fuel consumption.
    10.7 sec acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh 11.8 sec acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
  8. More capacity of fuel tank
    14% or 8 l more. The greater the fuel tank capacity, the further the vehicle can travel without refueling.
    56 l capacity of fuel tank 48 l capacity of fuel tank
  9. Less CO2 emissions
    8% or 11 g/km less. The less CO2 emission the vehicle releases, the less damage to the environment it causes.
    143 g/km / 230g/mile CO2 emissions 154 g/km / 248g/mile CO2 emissions
  10. More maximum towing weight with brakes
    7% or 130 kg more. The greater the permitted trailer load with brakes, the more the vehicle can tow larger and heavier trailers without damaging the engine.
    2000 kg / 4405lbs maximum towing weight with brakes 1870 kg / 4119lbs maximum towing weight with brakes
  11. Less weight
    3% or 44 kg less. Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
    1611-1680 kg / 3548lbs weight 1655 kg / 3645lbs weight

3 reasons to buy Subaru Forester

  1. More minimum boot capacity
    5% or 26 l more. The lower the trunk capacity, the fewer items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
    494 l minimum boot capacity 520 l minimum boot capacity
  2. More maximum trunk space
    10% or 171 l more. The greater the trunk capacity, the more items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
    1608 l maximum trunk space 1779 l maximum trunk space
  3. Shorter wheelbase
    1% or 30 mm shorter. The shorter the wheelbase, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range. Also, shorter wheel-based cars are easier to steer out of a skid.
    2700 mm wheelbase 2670 mm wheelbase

Neutral reasons Mazda CX-5 vs. Subaru Forester

  1. Engine position
    Front, Transverse Engine position Front, Transverse Engine position
  2. Cylinders location
    Inline Cylinders location Boxer Cylinders location
  3. Fuel supply
    Diesel Commonrail Fuel supply Direct injection Fuel supply
  4. doors
    5 doors 5 doors
  5. width including mirrors
    2115 mm width including mirrors 2065 mm width including mirrors
  6. Length
    Subaru Forester is 2% or 75 mm longer
    4550 mm Length 4625 mm Length
  7. Width
    Mazda CX-5 is 25 mm wider
    1840 mm Width 1815 mm Width
  8. Height
    Subaru Forester is 3% or 50 mm higher
    1680 mm Height 1730 mm Height
  9. ride height The greater the ride height, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range.
    185 - 193 mm ride height 220 mm ride height
  10. Front tires size
    1595 mm Front tires size 225/60 R17 Front tires size
Engine and transmission
cylinders
4
cylinders
4
valves per cylinder
4
valves per cylinder
4
compression
14.4
compression
12.5
Piston stroke
94.3 mm
Piston stroke
90 mm
Engine position
Front, Transverse
Engine position
Front, Transverse
Cylinders location
Inline
Cylinders location
Boxer
cylinder bore
86 mm
cylinder bore
84 mm
Performance
engine power
150 hp @ 4500 rpm.
110kW
engine power
150 hp @ 5600-6000 Rpm
110kW
torque
380 Nm @ 1800-2600 Rpm
torque
194 Nm @ 4000 rpm.
acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
10.7 sec
acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
11.8 sec
top speed
200 km/h
124mph
top speed
117 km/h
73mph
acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
10.7 sec
acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
11.8 sec
Fuel consumption
capacity of fuel tank
56 l
capacity of fuel tank
48 l
Fuel supply
Diesel Commonrail
Fuel supply
Direct injection
Emissions
CO2 emissions
143 g/km
230g/mile
CO2 emissions
154 g/km
248g/mile
Weight and capacity
minimum boot capacity
494 l
minimum boot capacity
520 l
maximum trunk space
1608 l
maximum trunk space
1779 l
maximum towing weight with brakes
2000 kg
4405lbs
maximum towing weight with brakes
1870 kg
4119lbs
weight
1611-1680 kg
3548lbs
weight
1655 kg
3645lbs
seats
5
seats
5
Other specs
turning radius
11.0 m
turning radius
10.8 m
doors
5
doors
5
width including mirrors
2115 mm
width including mirrors
2065 mm
Dimensions
Length
4550 mm
Length
4625 mm
Width
1840 mm
Width
1815 mm
Height
1680 mm
Height
1730 mm
wheelbase
2700 mm
wheelbase
2670 mm
ride height
185 - 193 mm
ride height
220 mm
Wheels and tires
Front tires size
1595 mm
Front tires size
225/60 R17
View full list
Comparing Mazda CX-5 with Subaru Forester will help you make decision which car is better. We revealed 11 factors to purchase Mazda CX-5 - it's winning Subaru Forester, according to such points. Anyway, Subaru Forester provides 3 weighty pluses that make it wonderful buy instead of Mazda CX-5. We can name vital specs of Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester which were used while making comparison. It can help you choose the better vehicle - compare two cars before buying. CX-5 was produced by Mazda to win contestants in the class. The detailed match won't keep any hesitations about deciding on a car.

Comparison of Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester: conclusions and opinions

When buyers take Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester and view all the specs, it's difficult to make a quick conclusion. Spend 2 minutes to read all facts about the comparison. There are 4 vital paragraphs and a final conclusion to learn everything about Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester.

General Review of Subaru Forester vs. Mazda CX-5

There are actually huge and minor distinctions in these two cars. There was a time when Subaru shipped quite a lot of Forester cars. But Mazda with its CX-5, also guarantees wonderful opportunities and is a leader in some situations. The dimensions ratio of the cars is an important thing to view. The height of Subaru Forester is 1730 mm ; it offers a length of 4625 mm and width of 1815 mm ; it is . Match it with 1680 mm of height, 1840 mm of width, and 4550 mm of length of Mazda CX-5. It weighs nearly . Looking at wheelbase, Subaru Forester shows 2670 mm and Mazda CX-5 has got 2700 mm of base length.

Now it's time to consider motors. Subaru Forester offers 4 cylinders engine with 150 hp @ 5600-6000 rpm. capacity. 4 cylinders and 150 hp @ 4500 rpm. of output are found under the hood of Mazda CX-5. Thinking about speeding, Subaru Forester goes from 0 to 60 miles per hour for 11.2 sec while Mazda CX-5 makes it for 10.2 sec . It's needed to take into account that the max speed of CX-5 is 200 km/h while Forester will drive at 117 km/h.

Safety of Mazda CX-5 in comparison with Subaru Forester

These cars are considered to be quite safe. For Mazda CX-5, safety options became an important part of producing, and Mazda did the best for the time. That's why CX-5 wins a lot of safety comparisons. Safety of a human is the major plus of Subaru Forester. The vehicle was also a ratings leader and turned Subaru popular.Also, Forester has got wonderful steering and breaking systems for enhanced safety.

Which car is more Eco-friendly: Mazda CX-5 or Subaru Forester

It's really important if your personal vehicle is nature friendly. Emission of CO2 for Mazda CX-5 equals 143 g/km, but Subaru Forester worsens this figure - 154 g/km. CX-5 is more ecological than Forester. We need to think of which engine types produce pollution. Consider Mazda: its vehicle proposes 150 hp @ 4500 rpm. of capacity. 150 hp @ 5600-6000 rpm. engine is a less-friendly decision of Subaru.

Fuel consumption and efficiency of Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5

When talking about gas consumption, we have to see numbers. Mazda CX-5 can only get while Subaru Forester extends this number to . It's easy to understand that 1 gallon will drive you further with Subaru than Mazda. of fuel allows drivers to go quite a distance with Forester on one fill. Compare it to tank's volume in CX-5. By using more gas, the Mazda CX-5 offers all the winning options of a engine. The motor of the CX-5 causes less problems than the motor of the Forester. Anyway the Subaru Forester can save owners' funds because the engine is only .

Conclusion and opinions

It's not easy to know if Subaru Forester wins in competition with Mazda CX-5. The cars are successful in car shops. Think of CX-5 through 11 evident advantages to get it, but don't forget about the 3 pluses of Forester. If you're a adorer of Mazda, then you'll discover more minuses of Subaru, but try to be impartial when comparing these vehicles.