Last Update: Mar. 22, 2019, 5:39 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Toyota Urban Cruiser

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Toyota Urban Cruiser?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Toyota Urban Cruiser

11 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 72.5 mm 16% or 13.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 86 mm vs 80.5 mm 6% or 5.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

126 bhp vs 101 bhp

94 kw. vs 74 kw.

20% or 25 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 178 nM vs 132 nM 26% or 46 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 11.7 sec. vs 12.5 sec. 0.8 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 50.43 mpg 73% or 21.33 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 56% or 20.26 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 95% or 20.53 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 42 liters 30% or 18 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 800 kg 47% or 700 kg
Other specs
More seats 6 vs 5 1

8 reasons to buy Toyota Urban Cruiser

Engine and transmission
Better compression 11.5 vs 9.5 17% or 2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 80 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 78% or 62 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 314 liters vs 182 liters 42% or 132 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 99441 miles vs 62150 miles 38% or 37291 miles
More standard warranty - Years 5 years vs 3 years 40% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1140 kg vs 1440 kg 26% or 300 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Toyota Urban Cruiser

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 6000 RPM 10% or 600 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 1329 cm3 33% or 669 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 3930 mm 13% or 600 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1725 mm 2% or 30 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1525 mm 8% or 135 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 195/60 R16
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 195/60 R16
Spare wheel 195/65R14 steel vs Compact
Type of wheels 14 alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)