Last Update: Mar. 18, 2019, 5:01 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Volvo C30

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Volvo C30?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Volvo C30

6 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Better compression 9.5 vs 9.0 5% or 0.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 83 mm 3% or 3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 32.51 mpg 12% or 3.41 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 43.46 mpg 20% or 7.26 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 22.61 mpg 4% or 0.92 mpg
Other specs
More seats 6 vs 4 2

12 reasons to buy Volvo C30

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston stroke longer 93.2 mm vs 86 mm 8% or 7.2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

220 bhp vs 126 bhp

162 kw. vs 94 kw.

43% or 94 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 178 nM 44% or 142 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.7 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 5 sec.
More top speed 149 mph vs 109 mph 40 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 129 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 10% or 13 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 364 liters vs 182 liters 50% or 182 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 62 liters vs 60 liters 3% or 2 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1347 kg vs 1440 kg 7% or 93 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Volvo C30

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 5000 RPM 7% or 400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 2521 cm3 21% or 523 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4252 mm 6% or 278 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1782 mm 5% or 87 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1447 mm 13% or 213 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 215/45 R18
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 215/45 R18
Spare wheel 195/65R14 steel vs tyre sealant kit
Type of wheels 14 alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)