Last Update: Mar. 21, 2019, 5:35 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Volvo S80

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Volvo S80?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Volvo S80

6 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 81 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 38.69 mpg 33% or 9.59 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 32% or 11.67 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 28.5 mpg 31% or 6.81 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1440 kg vs 1696 kg 18% or 256 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 6 vs 5 1

12 reasons to buy Volvo S80

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 17.3 vs 9.5 45% or 7.8 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 93.1 mm vs 86 mm 8% or 7.1 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

185 bhp vs 126 bhp

136 kw. vs 94 kw.

32% or 59 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 400 nM vs 178 nM 56% or 222 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 2.7 sec.
More top speed 140 mph vs 109 mph 31 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 121 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 17% or 21 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 422 liters vs 182 liters 57% or 240 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 60 liters 14% or 10 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1500 kg 25% or 500 kg

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Volvo S80

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 4000 RPM 26% or 1400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 2400 cm3 17% or 402 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4851 mm 7% or 321 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1861 mm 9% or 166 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1493 mm 10% or 167 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 225/50 R17
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 225/50 R17
Spare wheel 195/65R14 steel vs tyre sealant kit
Type of wheels 14 alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)