Last Update: May. 18, 2019, 5:20 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Urban Cruiser and Volvo 780

What is Better Toyota Urban Cruiser or Volvo 780?

Exterior

Toyota Urban Cruiser Volvo 780

3 reasons to buy Toyota Urban Cruiser

Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 749 liters vs 418 liters 44% or 331 liters
More maximum bearing capacity 450 kg vs 340 kg 24% or 110 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1140 kg vs 1460 kg 28% or 320 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

10 reasons to buy Volvo 780

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

170 bhp vs 101 bhp

123 kw. vs 74 kw.

41% or 69 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 240 nM vs 132 nM 45% or 108 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.20 sec. vs 12.5 sec. 2.3 sec.
More top speed 117 mph vs 109 mph 8 mph
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 418 liters vs 314 liters 25% or 104 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1800 kg vs 1590 kg 12% or 210 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 730 kg vs 550 kg 25% or 180 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 800 kg 47% or 700 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 9.90 meters vs 11 meters 11% or 1.1 meters

Neutral reasons Toyota Urban Cruiser vs. Volvo 780

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6000 RPM vs 5400 RPM 10% or 600 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1329 cm3 vs 2849 cm3 53% or 1520 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 4 2 more
Dimensions
Length 3930 mm vs 4795 mm 18% or 865 mm shorter
Width 1725 mm vs 1750 mm 1% or 25 mm narrower
Height 1525 mm vs 1400 mm 8% or 125 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2460 mm vs 2770 mm 11% or 310 mm less
Front tires size 195/60 R16 vs 205/60HR15
Rear tires size 195/60 R16 vs 205/60HR15
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)