Last Update: May. 23, 2019, 5:10 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Urban Cruiser and Volvo XC70

What is Better Toyota Urban Cruiser or Volvo XC70?

Exterior

Toyota Urban Cruiser Volvo XC70

7 reasons to buy Toyota Urban Cruiser

Engine and transmission
Better compression 11.5 vs 9.3 19% or 2.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 80 g/mile vs 167 g/mile 109% or 87 g/mile
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 99441 miles vs 62150 miles 38% or 37291 miles
More standard warranty - Years 5 years vs 3 years 40% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1140 kg vs 1909 kg 67% or 769 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 11.5 meters 5% or 0.5 meters

18 reasons to buy Volvo XC70

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 82 mm vs 72.5 mm 12% or 9.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 93.2 mm vs 80.5 mm 14% or 12.7 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

285 bhp vs 101 bhp

210 kw. vs 74 kw.

65% or 184 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 400 nM vs 132 nM 67% or 268 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.6 sec. vs 12.5 sec. 4.9 sec.
More top speed 130 mph vs 109 mph 21 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 24.61 mpg vs 50.43 mpg 105% or 25.82 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 33.19 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 70% or 23.27 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 17 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 148% or 25.22 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 815 liters vs 314 liters 61% or 501 liters
More maximum trunk space 1600 liters vs 749 liters 53% or 851 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 42 liters 40% or 28 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2410 kg vs 1590 kg 34% or 820 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 501 kg vs 450 kg 10% or 51 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 550 kg 27% or 200 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 800 kg 60% or 1200 kg
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 40 kg 60% or 60 kg

Neutral reasons Toyota Urban Cruiser vs. Volvo XC70

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6000 RPM vs 5600 RPM 7% or 400 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1329 cm3 vs 2953 cm3 55% or 1624 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 3930 mm vs 4838 mm 19% or 908 mm shorter
Width 1725 mm vs 1861 mm 7% or 136 mm narrower
Height 1525 mm vs 1421 mm 7% or 104 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2460 mm vs 2815 mm 13% or 355 mm less
Front tires size 195/60 R16 vs 235/55 R17
Rear tires size 195/60 R16 vs 235/55 R17
Spare wheel Compact vs repair kit
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 5 spokes vs SARGAS
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)