Last Update: May. 23, 2019, 5:10 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Volkswagen Bora and Volkswagen Lupo

What is Better Volkswagen Bora or Volkswagen Lupo?

Exterior

Volkswagen Bora Volkswagen Lupo

13 reasons to buy Volkswagen Bora

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 86.4 mm 10% or 9.1 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

100 bhp vs 60 bhp

74 kw. vs 44 kw.

40% or 40 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 240 nM vs 115 nM 52% or 125 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 12.1 sec. vs 16.8 sec. 4.7 sec.
More top speed 117 mph vs 97 mph 20 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 53.27 mpg vs 64.13 mpg 20% or 10.86 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 64.13 mpg vs 78.41 mpg 22% or 14.28 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 41.48 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 15% or 6.39 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 55 liters vs 34 liters 38% or 21 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1830 kg vs 1430 kg 22% or 400 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 403 kg vs 388 kg 4% or 15 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 600 kg vs 450 kg 25% or 150 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1300 kg vs 800 kg 38% or 500 kg

6 reasons to buy Volkswagen Lupo

Engine and transmission
Better compression 19.5 vs 19.0 3% or 0.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 74 g/mile vs 89 g/mile 20% or 15 g/mile
Less noise level 73 dB vs 74 dB 1% or 1 dB
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 830 liters vs 455 liters 45% or 375 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1042 kg vs 1427 kg 37% or 385 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.2 meters vs 10.9 meters 7% or 0.7 meters

Neutral reasons Volkswagen Bora vs. Volkswagen Lupo

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 4200 RPM 5% or 200 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1896 cm3 vs 1716 cm3 9% or 180 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection with turbocharging vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4376 mm vs 3527 mm 19% or 849 mm shorter
Width 1735 mm vs 1639 mm 6% or 96 mm wider
Height 1446 mm vs 1459 mm 1% or 13 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2513 mm vs 2323 mm 8% or 190 mm more
Front tires size 195/65 R15V vs 175/65 R13T
Rear tires size 195/65 R15V vs 175/65 R13T
Spare wheel 195/65 R15V vs 175/65 R13T
Type of wheels 6Jx15" steel vs 5.5Jx13" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)