Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Maybach 62

What is Better BMW Alpina or Maybach 62?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Maybach 62 can help buyers make it clear which model is better. We found 9 ideas to purchase BMW Alpina - it's better than Maybach 62, according to these points. But Maybach 62 also has many pluses: get to know 11 reasons why it's better than BMW Alpina. By examining the most important characteristics, our team revealed key distinctions between BMW Alpina and Maybach 62. BMW did everything to introduce Alpina as the best car in its competitive section. Nevertheless Maybach doesn't lag behind and offers its new developments in 62.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Maybach 62

9 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 3 1 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Better compression 17.0 vs 9.0 47% or 8 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 82 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 87 mm 3% or 3 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 218 g/mile 125% or 121 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Other specs
Less weight 1460 kg vs 2855 kg 96% or 1395 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.1 meters vs 14.8 meters 33% or 3.7 meters
More seats 5 vs 4 1

11 reasons to buy Maybach 62

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 12 vs 4 8 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

550 bhp vs 200 bhp

405 kw. vs 147 kw.

64% or 350 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 900 nM vs 410 nM 54% or 490 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.4 sec. vs 7.4 sec. 2 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 145 mph 10 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 17.8 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 169% or 30.07 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 25.71 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 134% or 34.34 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.5 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 211% or 24.31 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 110 liters vs 61 liters 45% or 49 liters
More maximum allowable weight 3380 kg vs 1980 kg 41% or 1400 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 525 kg vs 520 kg 1% or 5 kg

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Maybach 62

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5250 RPM 24% or 1250 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 5513 cm3 64% or 3518 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V12
Camshaft DOHC vs QUAD CAM
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs With a twin-turbocharged
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 6165 mm 27% or 1645 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1980 mm 8% or 163 mm narrower
Height 1413 mm vs 1573 mm 10% or 160 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 3827 mm 28% or 1067 mm less
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 275/50 R19
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 275/50 R19
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 275/50 R19
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 19" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)