Last Update: Mar. 28, 2020, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and SEAT Alhambra

What is Better BMW X1 or SEAT Alhambra?

Exterior

BMW X1 SEAT Alhambra

11 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Better compression 16.5 vs 10.0 39% or 6.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 76.5 mm 9% or 7.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 75.6 mm 16% or 14.4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 320 nM vs 240 nM 25% or 80 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 10.7 sec. 1.1 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 122 mph 2 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 104 g/mile 22% or 19 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 420 liters vs 267 liters 36% or 153 liters
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1470 kg vs 1696 kg 15% or 226 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.3 meters vs 11.9 meters 5% or 0.6 meters

9 reasons to buy SEAT Alhambra

Engine and transmission
More engine power

150 bhp vs 143 bhp

110 kw. vs 105 kw.

5% or 7 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 39.2 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 38% or 15.05 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 46.27 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 30% or 13.78 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 30.69 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 51% or 15.58 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 2297 liters vs 1350 liters 41% or 947 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 61 liters 13% or 9 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2480 kg vs 2030 kg 18% or 450 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 784 kg vs 560 kg 29% or 224 kg
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 5 2

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. SEAT Alhambra

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5800 RPM 31% or 1800 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1390 cm3 30% or 605 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4454 mm vs 4854 mm 8% or 400 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1904 mm 6% or 106 mm narrower
Height 1545 mm vs 1720 mm 10% or 175 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2919 mm 5% or 159 mm less
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/60 R16
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/60 R16
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes vs IZAROS
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)