Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and SsangYong Rexton

What is Better BMW X1 or SsangYong Rexton?

Look at match of BMW X1 vs. SsangYong Rexton by vital characteristics. Our research found 10 reasons to choose BMW X1 - it's beating SsangYong Rexton, according to such specs. But SsangYong Rexton also possesses a lot of pluses: think about 13 factors why it's winning BMW X1. By comparing the most important features, our team came up with evident differences between BMW X1 and SsangYong Rexton. You may compare two cars and form your own view about vehicles. The best ideas of BMW are presented in X1. Though don't forget that Rexton presents the unique technologies of SsangYong. After getting all the characteristics, you'll easily figure out which vehicle to purchase.


BMW X1 SsangYong Rexton

10 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

143 bhp vs 120 bhp

105 kw. vs 90 kw.

16% or 23 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 256 nM 20% or 64 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 16.17 sec. 6.57 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 98 mph 26 mph
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 152 g/mile 79% or 67 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 560 kg vs 371 kg 34% or 189 kg
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1470 kg vs 1879 kg 28% or 409 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

13 reasons to buy SsangYong Rexton

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Better compression 22 vs 16.5 25% or 5.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 89 mm vs 84 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92.4 mm vs 90 mm 3% or 2.4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 30.41 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 78% or 23.84 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 39.27 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 53% or 20.78 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.61 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 105% or 23.66 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 940 liters vs 420 liters 55% or 520 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 61 liters 24% or 19 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2250 kg vs 2030 kg 10% or 220 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 3500 kg vs 1800 kg 49% or 1700 kg
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 75 kg 25% or 25 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.2 meters vs 11.3 meters 1% or 0.1 meters

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. SsangYong Rexton

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 2874 cm3 31% or 879 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Length 4454 mm vs 4720 mm 6% or 266 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1870 mm 4% or 72 mm narrower
Height 1545 mm vs 1760 mm 12% or 215 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2820 mm 2% or 60 mm less
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 235/70R16
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 235/70 R16
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs 235/70 R16
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 16" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)