Important to Know
fresh posts
Sizes and Dimensions
Parts & Accessories
Home >>> >>> Kia Cerato and Mitsubishi Lancer
 VS 

What is Better Kia Cerato or Mitsubishi Lancer?

Exterior

Kia Cerato Mitsubishi Lancer

3 reasons to buy Kia Cerato

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.3 vs 9.0 48% or 8.3. The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 82 g/mile vs 151 g/mile 84% or 69 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1309 kg vs 1595 kg 122% or 1595 kg. Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

13 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Lancer

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 86 mm vs 72.2 mm 16% or 13.8mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 86 mm vs 84.5 mm 2% or 1.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

237 bhp vs 113 bhp

177 kw. vs 85 kw.

52% or 124 bhp More power of car = more top speed.
More torque

343 nM vs 255 nM

253 lbs-ft vs 188 lbs-ft

26% or 88 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.1 sec. vs 11.8 sec. 4.7 sec.
More top speed 136 mph vs 115 mph 21 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 27.7 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 104% or 28.76 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 34.91 mpg vs 67.24 mpg 93% or 32.33 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 20.29 mpg vs 43.46 mpg 114% or 23.17 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum allowable weight 2045 kg vs 1815 kg 11% or 230 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 450 kg vs 185 kg 59% or 265 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1400 kg vs 1200 kg 14% or 200 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years

Neutral reasons Kia Cerato vs. Mitsubishi Lancer

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6000 RPM 33% or 2000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1582 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 21% or 416 cm3 less
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Turbocharged and intercooled
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4340 mm vs 4585 mm 5% or 245 mm shorter
Width 1735 mm vs 1760 mm 1% or 25 mm narrower
Height 1470 mm vs 1515 mm 3% or 45 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2610 mm vs 2635 mm 1% or 25 mm less
Front tires size 195/60 R15 vs 215/45 R18
Rear tires size 195/60 R15 vs 215/45 R18
Spare wheel 195/60 R15 vs Compact
Type of wheels 15" steel vs 18" alloy wheels

Related:

*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)