Last Update: Mar. 20, 2019, 5:04 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Picnic and Opel Antara

What is Better Toyota Picnic or Opel Antara?

Exterior

Toyota Picnic Opel Antara

4 reasons to buy Toyota Picnic

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 45.04 mpg 55% or 15.94 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 54 mpg 49% or 17.8 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.69 mpg vs 34.01 mpg 57% or 12.32 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1440 kg vs 1736 kg 21% or 296 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

8 reasons to buy Opel Antara

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 16 vs 4 12 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

163 bhp vs 126 bhp

118 kw. vs 94 kw.

23% or 37 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 350 nM vs 178 nM 49% or 172 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.90 sec. vs 11.7 sec. 1.8 sec.
More top speed 117 mph vs 109 mph 8 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 104 g/mile vs 142 g/mile 37% or 38 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 402 liters vs 182 liters 55% or 220 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1500 kg 25% or 500 kg

Neutral reasons Toyota Picnic vs. Opel Antara

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 3800 RPM 30% or 1600 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1998 cm3 vs 2231 cm3 10% or 233 cm3 less
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 6 2 less
Dimensions
Length 4530 mm vs 4596 mm 1% or 66 mm shorter
Width 1695 mm vs 1850 mm 8% or 155 mm narrower
Height 1660 mm vs 1761 mm 6% or 101 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Front tires size 195/65R14 vs 235/55R18
Rear tires size 195/65R14 vs 235/55R18
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)