Last Update: May. 27, 2019, 5:39 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Toyota Starlet and Volvo V60

What is Better Toyota Starlet or Volvo V60?

Exterior

Toyota Starlet Volvo V60

3 reasons to buy Toyota Starlet

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 41.48 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 2% or 0.74 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 32.11 mpg vs 32.51 mpg 1% or 0.4 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 830 kg vs 1570 kg 89% or 740 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

13 reasons to buy Volvo V60

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.0 vs 9.6 4% or 0.4 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 79 mm vs 74 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 81.4 mm vs 77.4 mm 5% or 4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

180 bhp vs 74 bhp

132 kw. vs

59% or 106 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.5 sec. vs 11.9 sec. 3.4 sec.
More top speed 137 mph vs 103 mph 34 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 101 g/mile 4% or 4 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 557 liters vs 214 liters 62% or 343 liters
More maximum trunk space 1241 liters vs 214 liters 83% or 1027 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 67.5 liters vs 45 liters 33% or 22.5 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 900 kg 44% or 700 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years

Neutral reasons Toyota Starlet vs. Volvo V60

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5400 RPM vs 5700 RPM 5% or 300 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1332 cm3 vs 1595 cm3 16% or 263 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft SOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 3740 mm vs 4628 mm 19% or 888 mm shorter
Width 1635 mm vs 1865 mm 12% or 230 mm narrower
Height 1378 mm vs 1484 mm 7% or 106 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2300 mm vs 2776 mm 17% or 476 mm less
Front tires size 195/45 R15 vs 215/50 R17
Rear tires size 195/45 R15 vs 215/50 R17
Spare wheel 195/45 R15 vs tyre sealant kit
Type of wheels alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)