What is better Renault Clio or Ford Expedition?


Comparing Renault Clio with Ford Expedition may help people make it clear which model is worth buying. When comparing the models, buyers will reveal 2 points that send Renault Clio to first place in comparison with Ford Expedition. Ford Expedition still has got 9 reasons to pick it forgetting about Renault Clio. We can name major options of Renault Clio and Ford Expedition that were employed while making comparison. You may compare two cars and express your personal opinion about vehicles. The best technologies of Renault are presented in Clio. But Expedition is impossible to call a less worthy vehicle, as Ford gave out a lot of money in the development. If you had the possibility, which car would you buy?


Renault Clio
Ford Expedition
Renault Clio
Ford Expedition

2 reasons to buy the Renault Clio

  1. Fewer weight
    113% or 1337 kg less. The weight of the vehicle affects fuel consumption, acceleration dynamics, braking distance, etc.
    1178 kg / 2595 lbs weight 2515 kg / 5540 lbs weight
  2. Shorter wheelbase
    29% or 760 mm shorter. The shorter the wheelbase, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range. Also, shorter-wheelbase cars are easier to steer out of a skid.
    2583 mm wheelbase 3343 mm wheelbase

9 reasons to buy the Ford Expedition

  1. More cylinders
    3 more cylinders. The more cylinders, the greater the engine stability with less vibration. Engine efficiency increases due to shorter pauses between strokes.
    3 cylinders 6 cylinders
  2. More engine power
    73% or 275 hp more. The greater the vehicle's power, the better the acceleration. Also, powerful cars go faster.
    100 hp / 74 kW engine power 375 hp / 276 kW engine power
  3. More torque
    75% or 477 Nm more. The higher the torque, the faster the acceleration.
    160 Nm @ 2750 rpm. torque 637 Nm @ 2250 rpm. torque
  4. More engine capacity
    71% or 2497 cc more The greater the engine capacity, the lower the wear and tear. Larger engine capacities provide longer vehicle lifespans.
    999 cc engine capacity 3496 cc engine capacity
  5. Greater fuel tank capacity
    61% or 65 l more. The greater the fuel tank capacity, the further the vehicle can travel without refueling.
    42 l fuel tank capacity 107 l fuel tank capacity
  6. Greater minimum boot capacity
    60% or 580 l more. The lower the trunk capacity, the fewer items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
    391 L minimum boot capacity 971 L minimum boot capacity
  7. More maximum trunk space
    69% or 2371 l more. The greater the trunk capacity, the more items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
    1069 L maximum trunk space 3440 L maximum trunk space
  8. More maximum towing weight with brakes
    69% or 1958 kg more. The greater the permitted trailer load with brakes, the more the vehicle can tow larger and heavier trailers without damaging the engine.
    900 kg / 1982 lbs maximum towing weight with brakes 2858 kg / 6295 lbs maximum towing weight with brakes
  9. More seats
    3 more. The more seats, the more passengers the car can carry.
    5 seats 8 seats

Neutral comparisons between the Renault Clio and the Ford Expeditionn

  1. Engine position
    Front, Transverse Engine position Front, Longitudinal Engine position
  2. Cylinders location
    Inline Cylinders location V engine Cylinders location
  3. Fuel supply
    Multi-point indirect Fuel supply Direct injection Fuel supply
  4. Doors
    5 Doors 5 Doors
  5. Width including mirrors
    1988 mm Width including mirrors 2372 mm Width including mirrors
  6. Width with mirrors folded
    1798 mm Width with mirrors folded 2123 mm Width with mirrors folded
  7. Length
    the Ford Expedition is 28% or 1586 mm longer
    4050 mm Length 5636 mm Length
  8. Height
    the Ford Expedition is 26% or 501 mm higher
    1440 mm Height 1941 mm Height
  9. Ride height The greater the ride height, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range.
    120 mm Ride height 249 mm Ride height
Engine and transmission
cylinders
3
cylinders
6
valves per cylinder
4
valves per cylinder
4
Engine position
Front, Transverse
Engine position
Front, Longitudinal
Cylinders location
Inline
Cylinders location
V engine
Performance
engine power
100 hp @ 5000 rpm.
74kW
engine power
375 hp @ 5000 rpm.
276kW
torque
160 Nm @ 2750 rpm.
torque
637 Nm @ 2250 rpm.
engine capacity
999 cc
engine capacity
3496 cc
Fuel consumption
fuel tank capacity
42 l
fuel tank capacity
107 l
Fuel supply
Multi-point indirect
Fuel supply
Direct injection
Weight and capacity
minimum boot capacity
391 l
minimum boot capacity
971 l
maximum trunk space
1069 l
maximum trunk space
3440 l
maximum towing weight with brakes
900 kg
1982 lbs
maximum towing weight with brakes
2858 kg
6295 lbs
weight
1178 kg
2595 lbs
weight
2515 kg
5540 lbs
seats
5
seats
8
Other specs
Doors
5
Doors
5
Width including mirrors
1988 mm
Width including mirrors
2372 mm
Width with mirrors folded
1798 mm
Width with mirrors folded
2123 mm
Dimensions
Length
4050 mm
Length
5636 mm
Height
1440 mm
Height
1941 mm
wheelbase
2583 mm
wheelbase
3343 mm
Ride height
120 mm
Ride height
249 mm
View full list
Comparing Renault Clio with Ford Expedition may help people make it clear which model is worth buying. When comparing the models, buyers will reveal 2 points that send Renault Clio to first place in comparison with Ford Expedition. Ford Expedition still has got 9 reasons to pick it forgetting about Renault Clio. We can name major options of Renault Clio and Ford Expedition that were employed while making comparison. You may compare two cars and express your personal opinion about vehicles. The best technologies of Renault are presented in Clio. But Expedition is impossible to call a less worthy vehicle, as Ford gave out a lot of money in the development. If you had the possibility, which car would you buy?

Comparison of Renault Clio and Ford Expedition: conclusions and opinions

It's important to review Renault Clio and Ford Expedition by viewing special features. Before you make a final decision, read trough our opinion about these two cars. There are 4 important sections and a final opinion to learn everything about Renault Clio and Ford Expedition.

General Review of Ford Expedition vs. Renault Clio

To start with, common data about the different sides should be outlined. There was a period when Ford shipped quite a lot of Expedition cars. But Renault also used new technologies to build the Clio. The dimensions ratio of the cars is a vital thing to view. Ford Expedition weighs 2515 kg and is 5636 mm long, 2029 mm wide, and 1941 mm in height. Renault Clio offers 4050 mm in length and in width, and the vehicle is 1440 mm in height. Also look at weight, which is 1178 kg for this model. In terms of wheelbase, Ford Expedition shows 3343 mm while Renault Clio has got 2583 mm of base.

We want to examine the engine specs of the vehicles. Ford Expedition offers 6 cylinders motor with 375 hp @ 5000 rpm. capacity. Owners of Renault Clio are able to employ 100 hp @ 5000 rpm. of power, as it's a simply built 3 -cylinder motor.

Safety of Renault Clio in comparison with Ford Expedition

Active and passive safety is on great scale for both models. For Renault Clio, safety technologies became an important stage of production, and Renault did the best it could. That's why Clio earns a lot of safety ratings. The safety features of Ford Expedition are wonderful for pedestrians. The model was also a ratings winner and turned Ford popular. Comparisons add a lot about Expedition passive safety technologies.

Conclusion and opinions

It's difficult to understand if Ford Expedition takes a lead in competition with Renault Clio. There are many buyers volunteering to pay for these cars. Expedition provides 9 obvious pluses but Clio also offers 2 huge superiorities. Be fair when thinking about the advantages and drawbacks of Renault and Ford.